Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive58.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 13 '19 at 22:41
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.8% Good
Memory 86.3
1-Core 71.1
2-Core 130
60% 95.8 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 266
32% 245 Pts
64-Core 282
18% 282 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2CT080A4 80GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 335u
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 95 95 95 94 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 312
Write 104
Mixed 149
SusWrite 93.2
36% 165 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 59.8
4K Mixed 29.4
110% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 132
102% 141 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$25
230GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 111 110 111 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 113
Write 118
Mixed 60.6
SusWrite 111
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 69%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
280GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 93 94 94 93 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 104
Write 90.3
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 92.8
63% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 54%
USB Disk 8GB
4GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 8.3 9.1 9.3 9.7 9.3 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
4.97% Terrible
Read 13.7
Write 1.8
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 8.6
8% 7.15 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.97%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 Kingston 99U5471-021.A00LF Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.5% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 9.3
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 9.9
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,066 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback