Apple MacBookPro12,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemApple MacBookPro12,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-E43C1C25D4880AD6
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190411
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 13 '19 at 08:54
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5257U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 102
2-Core 181
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 267
36% 267 Pts
64-Core 227
14% 227 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro HD 6100 (Mobile)
Apple(106B 013F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
7.46% Terrible
Lighting 9.2
Reflection 8.12
Parallax 9.06
8% 8.79 fps
MRender 6.71
Gravity 7.17
Splatting 11.9
7% 8.58 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.46%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2018)-$74
761GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101200WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 885 893 848 822 853 911 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
152% Outstanding
Read 916
Write 860
Mixed 862
SusWrite 869
198% 877 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 86.8
4K Mixed 47.7
143% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 458
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 361
274% 372 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 152%
Great: 335%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4B3445364533303445452D45474346 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.1% Average
MC Read 14
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 11.7
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro12,1 Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookPro12,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback