Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics160% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive276% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '19 at 17:14
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$170
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
83% Excellent
1-Core 121
2-Core 238
85% 180 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 890
84% 677 Pts
64-Core 1,162
78% 1,162 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$1,090
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Lighting 524
Reflection 497
Parallax 626
138% 549 fps
MRender 452
Gravity 580
Splatting 295
162% 442 fps
Poor: 123%
This bench: 160%
Great: 198%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$104
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1094 875 882 894 886 879 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
276% Outstanding
Read 2494
Write 2,263
Mixed 1,663
SusWrite 918
410% 1,835 MB/s
4K Read 57.4
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 79.3
256% 87.7 MB/s
DQ Read 989
DQ Write 824
DQ Mixed 926
688% 913 MB/s
Poor: 213%
This bench: 276%
Great: 335%
SanDisk Extreme 120GB-$169
111GB free
Firmware: R211
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 124 124 126 119 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 424
Write 143
Mixed 188
SusWrite 124
48% 220 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 79.1
4K Mixed 31.3
123% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 124
106% 156 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 82%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$60
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 125 128 128 129 125 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 125
Write 129
Mixed 84
SusWrite 127
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$170
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
76.3% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 26.1
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 22.2
60% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 103%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 8,629 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $425
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $330Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $82SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $683SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback