MSI MS-16GF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GE60 2PC
MotherboardMSI MS-16GF  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150413
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateOct 09 '16 at 00:22
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210H
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 86.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 182
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 265
36% 265 Pts
64-Core 264
16% 264 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
MSI(1462 1108) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4414
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.46% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 6.19
3% 7.5 fps
MRender 6.05
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.83
5% 5.41 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.46%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 120GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT4 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 401
Mixed 410
98% 439 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 96.8
4K Mixed 34.3
158% 57.6 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 99.6
DQ Mixed 90.9
90% 147 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 100%
Great: 109%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
690GB free
Firmware: JB0O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 132
Write 104
Mixed 112
87% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 0.48
4K Mixed 0.2
58% 0.44 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BF160B.C16 0420 AM1L16BC8R2-B1QS 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
55.3% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 16.4
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 21
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16GF Builds (Compare 460 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16GF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback