Asus N56JN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus N56JN  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N56JN
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140512
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 11 '19 at 06:17
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Memory 62.6
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 164
60% 106 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 364
36% 292 Pts
64-Core 390
24% 390 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 840M
Asus(1043 14AD) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3136
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
9.6% Terrible
Lighting 13.1
Reflection 9.73
Parallax 10.3
11% 11.1 fps
MRender 5.86
Gravity 13.2
Splatting 8.48
8% 9.18 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.6%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
213GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 408 428 401 372 406 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 457
Mixed 372
SusWrite 401
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 76.3
4K Mixed 49.4
158% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 337
257% 348 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 109%
Great: 134%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
120GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 76 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 94.2
Write 61.2
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 75.5
52% 70.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ASU16D3LS1KFG/4G Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
31.6% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 10.2
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 3.6
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N56JN Builds (Compare 235 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N56JN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $76
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback