MSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics80.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive127% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7977
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977)  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170515
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '19 at 00:32
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 91.6
1-Core 131
2-Core 255
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 665
67% 542 Pts
64-Core 696
43% 696 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.7.1
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Lighting 94.8
Reflection 86.1
Parallax 137
77% 106 fps
MRender 85.3
Gravity 101
Splatting 124
87% 103 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 404 356 351 347 331 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 438
Mixed 360
SusWrite 365
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 65.2
222% 79.9 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 358
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 127%
Great: 134%
LEXAR JD FIREFLY 2GB
2GB free, PID a575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
3.33% Terrible
Read 11
Write 1.8
Mixed 3
SusWrite 2.2
5% 4.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.33%
Great: 7%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
19GB free, PID a1a2
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
9.49% Terrible
Read 17.5
Write 17.8
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 1.1
18% 13.5 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 2.6
168% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.49%
Great: 17%
WD My Book 1140 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 99 100 101 102 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 95.7
Write 105
Mixed 71.4
SusWrite 101
127% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 59%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 8GB
7GB free, PID a1a2
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 9.3 9.3 9.2 9.3 9.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
5.52% Terrible
Read 16.1
Write 5.9
Mixed 6.2
SusWrite 9.2
11% 9.35 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.52%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2800 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
76.2% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 23.5
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 30.3
SC Mixed 23.1
68% 24 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977) Builds (Compare 4,961 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $713
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback