Asrock X99 Professional Gaming i7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 140%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics169% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsrock X99 Professional Gaming i7  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160804
Uptime18.8 Days
Run DateJul 10 '19 at 12:22
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-6850K-$360
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 85
1-Core 106
2-Core 229
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 752
76% 603 Pts
64-Core 886
60% 886 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$1,300
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
169% Outstanding
Lighting 553
Reflection 518
Parallax 630
145% 567 fps
MRender 511
Gravity 600
Splatting 303
171% 472 fps
Poor: 132%
This bench: 169%
Great: 200%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
339GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 826 597 597 598 595 595 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,719
Write 1,230
Mixed 574
SusWrite 635
230% 1,039 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 51.3
175% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 852
DQ Write 565
DQ Mixed 701
525% 706 MB/s
Poor: 151%
This bench: 193%
Great: 257%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$85
64GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 287 289 289 290 291 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 450
Write 434
Mixed 392
SusWrite 305
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 52.6
175% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 350
264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 107%
Great: 123%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$110
765GB free
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 443 443 436 432 433 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 456
Write 433
Mixed 385
SusWrite 438
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 87.8
4K Mixed 42.8
150% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 352
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 107%
Great: 124%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 5TB
111GB free
Firmware: 0342
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 86 86 85 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
9.39% Terrible
Read 59
Write 54.5
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 86.1
16% 69.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 8.7
4K Mixed 0.6
6% 3.23 MB/s
DQ Read 1
DQ Write 2.4
DQ Mixed 1.9
1% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.39%
Great: 18%
ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB
4.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 160 163 162 165 164 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 100
Write 160
Mixed 102
SusWrite 162
187% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 11.6
4K Mixed 0.9
428% 4.43 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 10.7
DQ Mixed 0.9
396% 4 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.2% Good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 19.3
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 17.2
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99 Professional Gaming i7 Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Professional Gaming i7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $1,484
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $35
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback