Lenovo 20150

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20150  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory4.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121219
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '19 at 16:40
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 89.5
1-Core 69.6
2-Core 112
58% 90.4 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 175
23% 174 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3902) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5069
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.64% Terrible
Lighting 4.03
Reflection 5.27
Parallax 2.78
3% 4.03 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.7
4% 4.98 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.64%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000BUCT-63PUZY0 500GB
448GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 30 61 53 68 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 81.3
Write 68.8
Mixed 40
SusWrite 54.8
45% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.1
48% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 50%
Generic Flash Disk 1GB
1GB free, PID ef18
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3.4 3.4 3.4 3 3.4 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
4.02% Terrible
Read 13.3
Write 2.5
Mixed 2
SusWrite 3.3
5% 5.27 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.02%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3160ED58E9W1600 RMT3150ED58E8W1600 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
53.6% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 17.3
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 14.5
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20150 Builds (Compare 834 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback