Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics37.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 08 '16 at 05:07
Run Duration392 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 94
1-Core 97
2-Core 196
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 446
51% 398 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
PNY(196E 1033) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.6909
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Lighting 46.9
Reflection 42
Parallax 57.2
38% 48.7 fps
MRender 57.9
Gravity 39.6
Splatting 39
36% 45.5 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 379
Write 353
Mixed 365
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 43.9
4K Mixed 32.1
96% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 136
118% 177 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 124%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
458GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 94.3
Write 43.7
Mixed 73.9
53% 70.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.54
4K Mixed 0.43
106% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 65%
Seagate ST9160821AS 160GB-$60
35GB free
Firmware: 3.ALC Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 30.6
Write 30.2
Mixed 28.9
22% 29.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.72
4K Mixed 0.24
56% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 24%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 64GB-$72
58GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 244
Write 156
Mixed 146
216% 182 MB/s
4K Read 8.73
4K Write 10.6
4K Mixed 4.69
552% 8 MB/s
DQ Read 10.7
DQ Write 11.3
DQ Mixed 4.77
587% 8.94 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 104%
Great: 111%
Apple iPod 60GB
41GB free, PID 1209, Patriot AXLE 16GB USB 2.0
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
7.76% Terrible
Read 14
Write 13.5
Mixed 8.05
15% 11.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 0.88
4K Mixed 0.19
38% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.76%
Great: 8%
General USB Flash Disk 16GB
10GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
7.55% Terrible
Read 28.6
Write 8.12
Mixed 9.39
16% 15.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.73
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
26% 2.25 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.55%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CML8GX3M1A1600C10 029E CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 029E CML8GX3M1A1600C10 029E CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.6% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 18.3
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 19
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V EXTREME Builds (Compare 310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME - $550

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $1,020
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback