Gigabyte GA-880GM-D2H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 years ago, 10 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-880GM-D2H  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20100617
Uptime7.8 Days
Run DateApr 21 '14 at 09:53
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 925-$150
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 56.8
2-Core 113
39% 85.1 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 214
29% 214 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 40% Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203
Sapphire(174B E246) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.0.0
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 11.1
Reflection 21.4
Parallax 30.7
9% 21.1 fps
MRender 26.8
Gravity 35.5
Splatting 48.5
32% 36.9 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD 64GB-$56
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27% Poor
Read 238
Write 121
Mixed 142
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 8.86
4K Mixed 4.91
32% 9.14 MB/s
DQ Read 32.8
DQ Write 8.99
DQ Mixed 5.92
8% 15.9 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 27%
Great: 48%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
112GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 108
Write 88.4
Mixed 87.7
71% 94.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 2.13
4K Mixed 0.4
109% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 60%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
41GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 71.7
Write 64.9
Mixed 65.4
51% 67.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 2.01
4K Mixed 0.47
118% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 60%
Typical GA-880GM-D2H Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-880GM-D2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback