Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160 46,742 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	Memory 84.3 1-Core 75.3 2-Core 118 58% 92.5 Pts	4-Core 182 8-Core 182 24% 182 Pts	64-Core 184 11% 184 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520M 5,654 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 1682) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5946 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	1.96% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 2.73 Parallax 1.84 2% 2.29 fps	MRender 3.14 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 2.48 2% 2.64 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.96% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 120GB 1,888 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM11.1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 16 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 11 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 200 200 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1 (C2) HDA temperature 57 53 201864970283	41.8% Average	Read 495 Write 146 Mixed 195 60% 279 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 22.3 4K Mixed 5.83 42% 14.5 MB/s	DQ Read 16.4 DQ Write 25.8 DQ Mixed 31.8 21% 24.7 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ASU1333S9-4G-ECEWG 1x4GB 555 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	29.2% Poor	MC Read 9.7 MC Write 9.1 MC Mixed 8.6 26% 9.13 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 9.9 27% 9.53 GB/s	Latency 73 55% 73 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	36x
GeForce GT 520MNvidiaBench 2%, 5,654 samples	7x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	5x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	4x
Ultra Plus 256GBSanDisk $139Bench 81%, 17,545 samples	3x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $45Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	3x

RAM
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 029E CMSO4GX3M1A1333C9 8GBHynixBench 46%, 48 samples	5x
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 Kingston 99U5428-046.A00LF 8GBHynixBench 44%, 63 samples	3x
ASU1333S9-4G-ECEWG 1x4GBKingstonBench 27%, 555 samples	3x

Value: 50% - Average

Total price: $129