MSI B450 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B86)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B86
MotherboardMSI B450 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B86)  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 08 '19 at 16:02
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 113
2-Core 212
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 692
64% 535 Pts
64-Core 865
54% 865 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Asus(1043 8521) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.7% Below average
Lighting 42
Reflection 41.6
Parallax 36.2
34% 39.9 fps
MRender 38.8
Gravity 37.9
Splatting 33.5
30% 36.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 122 54 55 55 53 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 490
Write 436
Mixed 392
SusWrite 83.9
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 39.9
134% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 247
208% 302 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 91%
Kingston SUV500480G 480GB
275GB free
Firmware: 003056RA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 140 217 138 159 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 454
Write 411
Mixed 364
SusWrite 188
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 67.6
4K Mixed 41.4
138% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 170
150% 226 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 95%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
204GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 453 462 475 470 448 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 480
Mixed 409
SusWrite 446
103% 456 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 94
4K Mixed 56.3
184% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 370
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 121%
Great: 134%
HP Photosmart Prem 2GB
1GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.2 6.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.05% Terrible
Read 8.5
Write 4.7
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 6.3
8% 6 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.05%
Great: 3%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$48
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz
Performing below potential (84th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
97.2% Outstanding
MC Read 39
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 33.5
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 37.2
SC Mixed 24.7
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B86) Builds (Compare 2,986 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B86) - $83

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $640
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback