Biostar H110MHC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive57.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardBiostar H110MHC  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170214
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 07 '19 at 15:43
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 103
2-Core 201
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 318
34% 273 Pts
64-Core 383
24% 383 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 1C02) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 419.35
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 37.5
Reflection 47.7
Parallax 28.3
31% 37.8 fps
Splatting 31.9
33% 31.9 fps
Poor: 48% Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Jajs500m 120C 120GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P061
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 138 92 101 87 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 435
Write 146
Mixed 195
SusWrite 99.7
48% 219 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 23.8
94% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 90
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 97.6
80% 112 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 64%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
201GB free
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 78 58 45 43 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 130
Write 148
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 62.5
68% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
120% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
58% Above average
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 19.6
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 13
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 58%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110MHC Builds (Compare 296 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H110MHC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback