Packard EasyNote TV44HC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemPackard EasyNote TV44HC  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard VG50_HC_CR
Memory4.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 05 '19 at 18:19
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Memory 82.2
1-Core 76.3
2-Core 150
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 201
27% 201 Pts
64-Core 205
13% 205 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 064B) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.65% Terrible
Lighting 4.07
Reflection 5.81
Parallax 3.03
3% 4.3 fps
MRender 4.81
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 7.7
4% 4.92 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.65%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 120GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 146 52 52 52 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 311
Write 198
Mixed 236
SusWrite 99.1
47% 211 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 22
88% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 154
139% 207 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 Nanya NT2GC64B88G0NS-CG 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
46.1% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 14.7
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EasyNote TV44HC Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TV44HC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $52
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback