Gigabyte GA-AB350N-Gaming WIFI-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	42.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

System	Gigabyte AB350N-Gaming WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AB350N-Gaming WIFI-CF (all builds)
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180315
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 05 '19 at 13:12
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87 71,313 User benchmarks, average bench 61% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	65.4% Good	Memory 69.2 1-Core 97.6 2-Core 195 67% 121 Pts	4-Core 331 8-Core 507 52% 419 Pts	64-Core 530 33% 530 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% XFX(1682 9480) CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.4.3 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.6% Average	Lighting 49.5 Reflection 65.9 Parallax 68.1 40% 61.1 fps	MRender 66.9 Gravity 51.9 Splatting 55.2 47% 58 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Klevv NEO N600 M.2 120GB 166 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0921B SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 56 65 52 62 57 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	Read 472 Write 400 Mixed 384 SusWrite 95.9 76% 338 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 71.5 4K Mixed 37.2 125% 45 MB/s	DQ Read 266 DQ Write 265 DQ Mixed 220 178% 250 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 101%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB 66,048 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 145GB free Firmware: GR2OA3N0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 71 74 75 75 75 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	48.6% Average	Read 95 Write 95.5 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 74.1 54% 74.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 58%
SPCC PHD 320GB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 0GB free, PID 1d40 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 32 Write 29.3 Mixed 23.5 35% 28.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.2 38% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL16-16-16 D4-2400 2x4GB 8,035 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	MC Read 28.9 MC Write 26 MC Mixed 24.6 76% 26.5 GB/s	SC Read 19 SC Write 27.3 SC Mixed 23 66% 23.1 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AB350N-Gaming WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 520 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 56%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350N-Gaming WIFI-CF - $112

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	64x
Ryzen 5 2400GAMD $135Bench 63%, 127,344 samples	53x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	45x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	36x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	32x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	31x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	12x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	11x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	11x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	28x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 116% - Outstanding

Total price: $436

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16