Acer Aspire A315-51

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics5.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire A315-51  (all builds)
MotherboardSKL Venusaur_KL
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170912
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJul 05 '19 at 11:13
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6006U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
24.6% Poor
Memory 26.8
1-Core 31.5
2-Core 61.3
23% 39.9 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 157
18% 140 Pts
64-Core 138
9% 138 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Acer(1025 1191) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4708
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
5.04% Terrible
Lighting 5.33
Reflection 7.69
Parallax 4.72
4% 5.91 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 4.73
Splatting 11.2
6% 7.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.04%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
833GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 51 45 103 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 83.2
Write 76.2
Mixed 45
SusWrite 68.4
50% 68.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
117% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 79%
WD Elements 1TB
848GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 103 105 104 103 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
43% Average
Read 99.7
Write 96.5
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 104
118% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 43%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
50.3% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 18.4
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 8.6
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 274
15% 274 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A315-51 Builds (Compare 818 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback