Lenovo 81FV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive164% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81FV  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180718
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 05 '19 at 10:50
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 73.3
1-Core 122
2-Core 242
79% 145 Pts
4-Core 421
8-Core 559
62% 490 Pts
64-Core 637
39% 637 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 39FE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6292
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
4.7% Terrible
Lighting 5.67
Reflection 25.7
Parallax 5.19
5% 12.2 fps
MRender 4.81
Gravity 3.53
Splatting 8.43
5% 5.59 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.7%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS3030 500GB SSD
381GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS303121
SusWrite @10s intervals: 931 365 15 26 25 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 1,151
Write 1,460
Mixed 968
SusWrite 233
214% 953 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 53.5
184% 65.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,159
DQ Write 941
DQ Mixed 987
756% 1,029 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 164%
Great: 266%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
346GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 403 416 415 364 352 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 414
Mixed 399
SusWrite 389
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 76.4
4K Mixed 45.2
146% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 271
219% 310 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 103%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3260MD78HAF-2666 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.8% Poor
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 9.4
28% 9.73 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 7
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 94
42% 94 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81FV Builds (Compare 4,107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81FV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback