Asus Z8NA-D6(C)

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	13.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Z8NA-D6(C) (all builds)
Memory	7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100628
Uptime	4 Days
Run Date	Jul 05 '19 at 09:34
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5560 10 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	74.1% Very good	Memory 95.2 1-Core 74.5 2-Core 147 65% 105 Pts	4-Core 288 8-Core 472 46% 380 Pts	64-Core 749 46% 749 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Sapphire(174B 3001) CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.7 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	13.1% Very poor	Lighting 3.73 Reflection 6.27 Parallax 3 3% 4.33 fps	MRender 30.9 Gravity 47.7 Splatting 40.2 33% 39.6 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 153GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 95 91 97 95 101 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	49.5% Average	Read 228 Write 200 Mixed 198 SusWrite 95 40% 180 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 44.3 4K Mixed 31.4 102% 33.7 MB/s	DQ Read 33.6 DQ Write 78 DQ Mixed 45.3 38% 52.3 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 134%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 210GB free Firmware: 1AJ100E4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 11 8.8 11 8.7 9.4 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	5.32% Terrible	Read 9.5 Write 15.2 Mixed 12.7 SusWrite 9 9% 11.6 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.1 17% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 5.32% Great: 75%
Hitachi HCS5C1010CLA382 1TB 2,229 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 351GB free Firmware: JC4OA39C SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 34 32 33 30 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	24.8% Poor	Read 54.7 Write 20.7 Mixed 26 SusWrite 31.9 25% 33.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 55% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 64%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 225GB free Firmware: JP4OA25C SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 93 99 96 102 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	63.6% Good	Read 124 Write 98.5 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 97.7 68% 92.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x2GB 38,297 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 6 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM DDR3 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	52.7% Above average	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 18.9 55% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 8 26% 9.27 GB/s	Latency 56.7 71% 56.7 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z8NA-D6(C) Builds (Compare 124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus Z8NA-D6(C)

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	43x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	17x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	17x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	9x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	9x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	8x

SSD
RBU-SC152DS3764GG 64GBKingstonBench 59%, 13 samples	10x
MX500 250GBCrucial $39Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	4x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	3x

RAM
6x8GBUnknownBench 53%, 2,890 samples	31x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	15x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $92

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369