Asus G75VW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive69.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus G75VW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G75VW
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130107
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateJul 04 '19 at 23:39
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 86.1
1-Core 90.7
2-Core 177
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 435
45% 364 Pts
64-Core 436
27% 436 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660M
Asus(1043 2115) 2GB
CLim: 1085 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
9.21% Terrible
Lighting 10.2
Reflection 9.65
Parallax 12.1
8% 10.7 fps
MRender 14
Gravity 12.3
Splatting 13.7
11% 13.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.21%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2306RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 355 403 267 203 192 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 442
Write 405
Mixed 257
SusWrite 273
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 35.4
4K Mixed 20.1
76% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 121
130% 220 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8A-PB HMT351S6CFR8C-PB HMT351S6CFR8A-PB HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
56.4% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 17.2
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 17.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G75VW Builds (Compare 622 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G75VW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $27Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback