TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Presario V5000 (RG324UA#ABA)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Presario V5000 (RG324UA#ABA)  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 30AE
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060907
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 04 '19 at 12:45
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Mobile AMD Sempron 3300+
U23, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Memory 34.1
1-Core 6
2-Core 13.3
14% 17.8 Pts
4-Core 16.1
8-Core 18.9
2% 17.5 Pts
64-Core 24.8
2% 24.8 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑
This bench: 18.3%
 Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI MOBILITY RADEON XPRESS 200
HP(103C 30AE)
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.31.100.32
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 0.12
0% 0.11 fps
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD600UE-22KVT0 60GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03K01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 11 15 22 21 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 22.8
Write 15
Mixed 12
SusWrite 16.2
12% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
38% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑
This bench: 11.2%
 Great: 20%
Seagate BUP Slim WH 2TB
507GB free, PID ab24
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 9.1 12 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 15.3
Write 16.5
Mixed 12.8
SusWrite 13.1
20% 14.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.3
81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 11.4%
 Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
4.37% Terrible
MC Read 1.6
MC Write 1.1
MC Mixed 1.1
4% 1.27 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 0.6
SC Mixed 0.6
1% 0.47 GB/s
Latency 232
17% 232 ns
Poor: 6% ↑
This bench: 4.37%
 Great: 20%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback