Lenovo 3444CUU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 79% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 3444CUU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3444CUU
Memory1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181121
Uptime9 Days
Run DateJul 01 '19 at 08:03
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 20%
CPU Throttled 79%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3667U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
45.8% Average
Memory 61.7
1-Core 70.8
2-Core 123
50% 85 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 164
23% 171 Pts
64-Core 153
10% 153 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21F9) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.6% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 5.42
Parallax 2.84
3% 4.09 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.43
4% 4.89 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.6%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 521 Series 240GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LE9i
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 344
Write 216
Mixed 236
59% 265 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 43.4
4K Mixed 27
90% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 202
159% 220 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 69%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD050V -63 500GB
465GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 45 47 48 47 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 43
Write 47.2
Mixed 32
SusWrite 45.9
57% 42 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
25% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5174BM0-YH9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Chip DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
38.4% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 14.5
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 10.8
25% 8.73 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 3444CUU Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 3444CUU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback