Asus N61Jv

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus N61Jv  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N61Jv
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 30 '19 at 19:46
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 430
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
44.8% Average
Memory 64.4
1-Core 60.6
2-Core 114
48% 79.6 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 149
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Asus(1043 1252) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.63% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 0.88
Parallax 0.62
0% 0.73 fps
MRender 1.05
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.3
1% 0.95 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.63%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240 GB 240GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 132 79 4.6 75 71 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.4% Below average
Read 229
Write 202
Mixed 196
SusWrite 89.8
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 17
4K Mixed 12.1
44% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 76.6
DQ Mixed 34.7
42% 74.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 56%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$26
345GB free
Firmware: 0003SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 75 75 75 75 75 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 74.3
Write 67.4
Mixed 39.4
SusWrite 74.4
47% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
117% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5273BH1-CF8 857F H6451U64F7066G 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
24.1% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 10
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.4
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N61Jv Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N61Jv

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Below average Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback