Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141125
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateJun 30 '19 at 11:14
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 85.3
1-Core 80.3
2-Core 142
63% 102 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 433
42% 344 Pts
64-Core 427
26% 427 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 68%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS541616J9SA00 160GB-$82
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SB4OC80A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 15 12 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 22
Write 20.3
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 14.9
14% 18.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
59% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 25%
Asmt 2115 500GB
95GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 78 81 81 84 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 85.7
Write 73.3
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 81.5
47% 65.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
62% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 67%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$22
48GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 49 49 48 48 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Read 49
Write 4.2
Mixed 31.3
SusWrite 47.2
24% 32.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 61%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$27
175GB free
Firmware: 0003BSM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 46 43 45 45 46 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 62.8
Write 64.6
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 44.4
38% 51.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 43%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
35GB free
Firmware: KC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 46 44 45 45 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Read 55.6
Write 82.3
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 44.4
37% 51.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.4
175% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
95GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 49 49 48 48 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 99.3
Write 97.4
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 47.5
54% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 114%
Maxtor OneTouch 300GB
1GB free, PID 7000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 24.3
Write 20.7
Mixed 17.5
26% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
59% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 19%
Seagate Portable 250GB
7GB free, PID 2300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
8.71% Terrible
Read 23.2
Write 24.6
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 14.2
27% 20.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
46% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.71%
Great: 19%
WDC WD80 0BB-75CAA0 80GB
21GB free, PID 6830
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 23.3
Write 24.6
Mixed 18.1
SusWrite 15.3
27% 20.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
41.5% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 13.7
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 11.4
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0 Builds (Compare 1,728 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback