ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-16J5

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	151% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Micro-Star GP62 6QF
Motherboard	MSI MS-16J5 (all builds)
Memory	26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160429
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 04 '16 at 07:00
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	SGP-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74.2% Very good	Memory 82.8 1-Core 86.8 2-Core 172 67% 114 Pts	4-Core 354 8-Core 529 55% 442 Pts	64-Core 528 33% 528 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M 73,363 User benchmarks, average bench 16% MSI(1462 115A) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7290 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Lighting 22.5 Reflection 16.9 Parallax 19.6 18% 19.7 fps	MRender 24.3 Gravity 23.2 Splatting 16.9 17% 21.5 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WD10JPVX-22JC3T0 1TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 589GB free Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 101 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 10 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 56 46 44 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1011504921	112% Outstanding	Read 507 Write 463 Mixed 493 109% 488 MB/s	4K Read 34.1 4K Write 87.2 4K Mixed 45.9 157% 55.7 MB/s	DQ Read 351 DQ Write 307 DQ Mixed 159 166% 272 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 113%
Toshiba THNSN5128GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB 2,421 User benchmarks, average bench 150% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: 57XA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	151% Outstanding	Read 1,531 Write 401 Mixed 719 192% 883 MB/s	4K Read 35.4 4K Write 96.5 4K Mixed 51.6 171% 61.2 MB/s	DQ Read 297 DQ Write 227 DQ Mixed 148 142% 224 MB/s
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 151% Great: 279%
WD My Passport 259F 3TB 1,516 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 2TB free, PID 259f Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	Read 94.8 Write 100 Mixed 67.1 111% 87.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.84 4K Write 1.08 4K Mixed 0.15 45% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 49%
BUFFALO HD-PZU3 1TB 421 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 0GB free, PID 01f9 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	34.6% Below average	Read 50.4 Write 99.1 Mixed 81.2 108% 76.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.24 4K Write 1.83 4K Mixed 0.18 69% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4S240FSD.16FAD 2x16GB 326 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74.1% Very good	MC Read 26.9 MC Write 28.8 MC Mixed 24.4 76% 26.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 27.8 SC Mixed 20.1 60% 20.9 GB/s	Latency 75.5 53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical MS-16J5 Builds (Compare 1,644 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J5

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	1,171x
Core i5-6300HQIntelBench 54%, 41,531 samples	328x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	88x

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	946x
GTX 960MNvidiaBench 16%, 73,363 samples	507x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	91x

SSD
THNSNJ128G8NY 128GBToshibaBench 73%, 7,789 samples	155x
MTS800 M.2 128GBTranscend $126Bench 69%, 5,326 samples	56x
HFS128G39MNC-3510A 128GBBench 79%, 2,005 samples	32x

RAM
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 55,289 samples	285x
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 38%, 45,898 samples	237x
M471A1K43BB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 35%, 32,056 samples	173x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback