Lenovo 3093BU3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 5% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemLenovo 3093BU3  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3093BU3
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121011
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 29 '19 at 19:08
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 74%
CPU Throttled 5%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 L 640
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
35% Below average
Memory 58.5
1-Core 25.2
2-Core 41.9
30% 41.9 Pts
4-Core 69.6
8-Core 70
9% 69.8 Pts
64-Core 74.4
5% 74.4 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Legend(17AA 215A) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2622
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.6% Terrible
Lighting 0.63
Reflection 0.73
Parallax 0.72
0% 0.69 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.57
Splatting 1.09
1% 0.92 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.6%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme II 240GB-$110
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R131
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 162 163 159 116 78 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.6% Below average
Read 219
Write 212
Mixed 178
SusWrite 132
42% 185 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 19.8
4K Mixed 4
37% 12.7 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 17.6
54% 116 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 109%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
5GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 6.3 7.8 8.1 7.9 7.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
6.57% Terrible
Read 21.7
Write 0.5
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 6.8
9% 8.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
44% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.57%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT1970ED48E8F1066 02FE EBJ21UE8BDS0-AE-F 4GB
1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
21.7% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 9
22% 7.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 5.5
14% 4.8 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback