Gigabyte H310M A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive74.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte H310M A
MotherboardGigabyte H310M A  (all builds)
Memory14.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 29 '19 at 13:26
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 75.8
1-Core 131
2-Core 243
82% 150 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 506
68% 510 Pts
64-Core 480
30% 480 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Scorch M2 128GB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FM12.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 451 463 442 208 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 406
Write 365
Mixed 345
SusWrite 354
83% 368 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 0.4
72% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 461
DQ Mixed 330
269% 378 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 131%
Adata DashDrive UV128 USB 3.0 64GB-$10
9GB free, PID db8a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 16 16 16 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
9.91% Terrible
Read 27.5
Write 14.6
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 15.8
18% 14.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
58% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.91%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD416G26662 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.4% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 13
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 10.2
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 88.7
45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M A-CF Builds (Compare 712 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte H310M A - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $323
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback