Alienware M17x

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAlienware M17x  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110117
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 03 '16 at 12:35
Run Duration84 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 91.4
1-Core 57.4
2-Core 96.2
54% 81.7 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 208
23% 180 Pts
64-Core 230
14% 230 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5870
Dell(1028 043A) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.42% Terrible
Lighting 1.87
Reflection 1.38
Parallax 1.53
2% 1.59 fps
MRender 1.43
Gravity 1.37
Splatting 1.61
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 1.42%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
dell 640GB
343GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 139
Write 117
Mixed 129
97% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.04
4K Write 2.87
4K Mixed 0.84
189% 1.58 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9905428-105.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.1% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 13.2
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 10
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 65.1
62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M17x Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware M17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $252
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback