MSI CSM-B75MA-P45 (MS-7798)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7798
MotherboardMSI CSM-B75MA-P45 (MS-7798)  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 27 '19 at 20:31
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$30
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
43.6% Average
Memory 78
1-Core 57.5
2-Core 47.6
44% 61 Pts
4-Core 59.5
8-Core 51
8% 55.2 Pts
64-Core 35.6
2% 35.6 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.6.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31% Below average
Lighting 24.4
Reflection 26.4
Parallax 83.7
20% 44.8 fps
MRender 69.9
Gravity 70
Splatting 55.7
52% 65.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 31%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A 1TB
603GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 213 229 237 242 241 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
67.2% Good
Read 249
Write 240
Mixed 208
SusWrite 221
52% 230 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 33.4
114% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 153
124% 175 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 121%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
913GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 183 186 185 184 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 222
Write 174
Mixed 110
SusWrite 181
126% 172 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
234% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 116%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Vulcan-1600 Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-AE-F 04EF Vulcan-1600 Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-AE-F 12GB
1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.3% Poor
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 5.2
22% 7.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 12
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CSM-B75MA-P45 (MS-7798) Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI CSM-B75MA-P45 (MS-7798)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $562
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback