Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 M 640 5,045 User benchmarks, average bench 43% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	47.3% Average	Memory 64.7 1-Core 68.2 2-Core 118 50% 83.7 Pts	4-Core 174 8-Core 176 23% 175 Pts	64-Core 177 11% 177 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0601) 3.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.66% Terrible	Lighting 0.67 Reflection 0.92 Parallax 0.66 0% 0.75 fps	MRender 1.1 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.48 1% 1.02 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.66% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 201GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 256 258 256 255 258 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Generic- Multi-Card 16GB 320 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 15GB free, PID 0138 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 18.2 Write 17.7 Mixed 17.1 SusWrite 18 24% 17.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 2.6 171% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 14%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 F3-10666CL9-4GBSQ 8GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1067, 1067 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	24.8% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 10.5 24% 8.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 7.5 19% 6.73 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium P6200IntelBench 36%, 8,041 samples	45x
Pentium P6100IntelBench 35%, 6,283 samples	9x
Core i5 M 480IntelBench 41%, 16,023 samples	6x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	75x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	2x

RAM
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 8,481 samples	5x
ACR256X64D3S1333C9 2x2GBKingstonBench 29%, 3,134 samples	5x
NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 2x2GBNanyaBench 31%, 6,518 samples	4x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28