PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 8.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
System | Acer Veriton M480 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Acer Veriton M480 |
Memory | 2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20090807 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jun 26 '19 at 19:06 |
Run Duration | 114 Seconds |
Run User | MYS-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q8300-$115
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
|
37.1%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 850 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
8.21%
Terrible
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate ST3320613AS 320GB-$30
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SD22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 77 68 68 72 79 MB/s
|
33.9%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
|
19.7%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Duo E7600Intel $191Bench 40%, 4,159 samples | 6x |
Xeon E5430IntelBench 48%, 1,961 samples | 4x |
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples | 4x |
GPU | |
---|---|
G45/G43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 1%, 6,554 samples | 11x |
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 2x |
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 41% - Average | Total price: $219 |