Asus Q304UAK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus Q304UAK (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Q304UAK
Memory	2.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160823
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Jun 25 '19 at 23:12
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%
CPU Throttled	92%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7200U 205,332 User benchmarks, average bench 45% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	69.2% Good	Memory 91.5 1-Core 98.3 2-Core 181 73% 124 Pts	4-Core 274 8-Core 274 37% 274 Pts	64-Core 274 17% 274 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 58%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 590GB free (System drive) Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 14 16 72 103 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	20.5% Poor	Read 24.7 Write 34.5 Mixed 28.1 SusWrite 46.3 25% 33.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.3 76% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 20.5% Great: 71%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 128GB 2,131 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 29GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 3.3 3.5 4 3.1 4.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	6.74% Terrible	Read 13.2 Write 2.5 Mixed 8.5 SusWrite 3.6 8% 6.95 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1.5 99% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.74% Great: 16%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 250GB 281 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 232GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 5.5 8.2 8.7 9.7 10 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	8.78% Terrible	Read 22.9 Write 5.7 Mixed 9.2 SusWrite 7.9 13% 11.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1.4 93% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.78% Great: 11%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 126GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 29GB free, PID 00c4 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.6 4.1 4.3 3.6 4.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	3.82% Terrible	Read 12 Write 10.7 Mixed 21.6 SusWrite 3.9 17% 12.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 19% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.82% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF51264HZ-2G3A2 Samsung M471A5644EB0-CPB 6GB 227 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2400, 2133 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	61.9% Good	MC Read 22.6 MC Write 23.3 MC Mixed 18.5 61% 21.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 19.9 54% 18.8 GB/s	Latency 65 62% 65 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q304UAK Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus Q304UAK

CPU
Core i5-7200UIntelBench 45%, 205,332 samples	87x
Core i7-7500UIntelBench 48%, 139,101 samples	1x

GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	88x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	3x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	3x
860 QVO 1TBSamsung $98Bench 89%, 201,200 samples	3x

RAM
8ATF51264HZ-2G3A2 Samsung M471A5644EB0-CPB 6GBMicronBench 57%, 227 samples	25x
8ATF51264HZ-2G3A2 Samsung M471A5143EB0-CPB 8GBMicronBench 69%, 114 samples	18x
M471A5143EB0-CPB M471A5644EB0-CPB 6GBSamsungBench 55%, 363 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $52

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16