Acer Predator PH315-52

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics83.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator PH315-52  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Covini_CFS
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 25 '19 at 16:43
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Memory 94.9
1-Core 136
2-Core 264
92% 165 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 862
83% 684 Pts
64-Core 1,046
65% 1,046 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1343) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3086
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 111
Parallax 96.8
85% 104 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 88
Splatting 83.1
81% 101 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 83%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN720 SDA 512GB
232GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10121000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1178 845 847 851 854 853 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 1,234
Write 1,826
Mixed 1,468
SusWrite 905
307% 1,358 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 58
196% 68.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,210
DQ Write 835
DQ Mixed 972
739% 1,005 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 211%
Great: 220%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 22.6
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 26.2
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 57.4
70% 57.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH315-52 Builds (Compare 3,937 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback