Asus H81M-P PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 44% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	63% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	45.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-P PLUS (all builds)
Memory	9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160429
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 25 '19 at 13:55
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790S-$60 13,224 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	Memory 87.5 1-Core 113 2-Core 215 79% 138 Pts	4-Core 380 8-Core 565 59% 472 Pts	64-Core 556 34% 556 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 590-$200 122,060 User benchmarks, average bench 57% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1560 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.6.2 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	63% Good	Lighting 79.3 Reflection 79.2 Parallax 99.6 65% 86 fps	MRender 78.1 Gravity 80.6 Splatting 64.7 60% 74.5 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: B1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 36 134 50 117 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	45.4% Average	Read 290 Write 88.5 Mixed 87 SusWrite 90.4 30% 139 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 28.7 4K Mixed 25.8 67% 22.3 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 97 86% 128 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 85%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 193GB free Firmware: B1D2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 168 149 222 166 149 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29% Poor	Read 137 Write 84 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 179 27% 118 MB/s	4K Read 11.8 4K Write 18.7 4K Mixed 9.1 39% 13.2 MB/s	DQ Read 14.4 DQ Write 15.4 DQ Mixed 14.3 11% 14.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 188GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 107 107 105 106 107 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	61.5% Good	Read 108 Write 109 Mixed 81.8 SusWrite 106 75% 101 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 227% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 2x8GB 6,401 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 21.1 MC Mixed 17 56% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 20.2 SC Mixed 19.2 52% 18.1 GB/s	Latency 70 57% 70 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-P PLUS Builds (Compare 361 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-P PLUS

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	75x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	68x
Core i3-4170Intel $59Bench 57%, 48,178 samples	33x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	37x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	36x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	31x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	23x
PLUS 480GBSandiskBench 48%, 58,990 samples	16x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	15x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	22x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	14x
M2F8G64CB8HB5N-DI 2x8GBNanyaBench 55%, 1,721 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $237

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16