Acer Aspire A515-51G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive83% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire A515-51G  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Charmander_KL
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190103
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJun 24 '19 at 23:38
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User URY-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8130U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
43.1% Average
Memory 60.3
1-Core 48.1
2-Core 106
43% 71.6 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 161
20% 155 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Acer(1025 1193) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6576
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
6.18% Terrible
Lighting 6.67
Reflection 10
Parallax 6.16
5% 7.61 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 5.77
Splatting 13.5
8% 8.72 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.18%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane+932GBHDD 1TB
783GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 16.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 123 119 127 117 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 328
Write 111
Mixed 155
SusWrite 118
39% 178 MB/s
4K Read 58.7
4K Write 36.8
4K Mixed 48.5
171% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 248
178% 233 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 83%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CRC 859B CT8G4SFS824A.M8FD 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
52% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 18.4
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 11
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 52%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A515-51G Builds (Compare 2,957 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A515-51G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback