Asus P9X79

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 55% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	95.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	49.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P9X79 (all builds)
Memory	1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	Цвета: 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140506
Uptime	4.6 Days
Run Date	Jun 24 '19 at 06:11
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3820 38,674 User benchmarks, average bench 70% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	68.6% Good	Memory 82.1 1-Core 93.8 2-Core 182 69% 119 Pts	4-Core 298 8-Core 444 46% 371 Pts	64-Core 454 28% 454 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Asus(1043 8623) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.94 Performing below potential (75^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	95.8% Outstanding	Lighting 122 Reflection 138 Parallax 127 100% 129 fps	MRender 96.6 Gravity 123 Splatting 104 88% 108 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 95.8% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 120GB-$79 15,015 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: DC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 72 58 78 79 69 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	49.3% Average	Read 308 Write 131 Mixed 168 SusWrite 72.5 38% 170 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 46.2 4K Mixed 25.2 89% 30.8 MB/s	DQ Read 132 DQ Write 98.6 DQ Mixed 83.7 71% 105 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 79%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 47GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 64 64 64 64 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	44.9% Average	Read 93.3 Write 79 Mixed 58.5 SusWrite 63.1 54% 73.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 60%
Toshiba MG03ACA200 2TB 1,166 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 60GB free Firmware: FL1A SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 130 129 124 128 130 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Read 135 Write 134 Mixed 55.7 SusWrite 128 82% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.1 212% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C10 4x2GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 4 of 8 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	62.8% Good	MC Read 24.1 MC Write 25.3 MC Mixed 21 67% 23.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 11.6 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 76.7 52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 75%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P9X79 Builds (Compare 1,715 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 58%

Gunboat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 47%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 - $300

CPU
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	655x
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	363x
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples	233x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	96x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	87x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	86x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	54x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	52x
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	42x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	53x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	39x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $508

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16