PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 2.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 26.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP EliteBook 8530w (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 30E7 |
Memory | 1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20111208 |
Uptime | 1.4 Days |
Run Date | Oct 01 '16 at 20:23 |
Run Duration | 115 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
37.4%
Below average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro FX 770M
HP(103C 30E7) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4192
|
2.26%
Terrible
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
26.5%
Poor
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
|
13.7%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Duo T9600Intel $170Bench 39%, 2,726 samples | 16x |
Core2 Duo T9400Intel $55Bench 39%, 3,295 samples | 10x |
Core2 Extreme Q9300Intel $172Bench 46%, 660 samples | 6x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro FX 770MNvidiaBench 2%, 849 samples | 44x |
Mobility Radeon HD 3650ATIBench 2%, 3,003 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 39% - Below average | Total price: $222 |