HP xw8400 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP xw8400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A08h
Memory22.4 GB free of 24.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101025
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 01 '16 at 12:20
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 5150
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
43.6% Average
Memory 66.5
1-Core 29.7
2-Core 61.4
36% 52.5 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 121
16% 122 Pts
64-Core 123
8% 123 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.6909
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.73% Terrible
Lighting 4.43
Reflection 4.31
Parallax 4.09
4% 4.28 fps
MRender 4.05
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 6.13
4% 4.66 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.73%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
548GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B01
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 109
Write 106
Mixed 102
80% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 1.25
4K Mixed 0.34
92% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
394GB free
Firmware: CC38
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 124
Write 109
Mixed 107
85% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.56
116% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST350032 500GB
127GB free
Firmware: NA00
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.9% Average
Read 72.3
Write 73.6
Mixed 68.5
54% 71.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.35
96% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 57GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 7.6
18% 6.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4.7
12% 4.1 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical xw8400 Workstation Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP xw8400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback