Asus M32CD4-K

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	74.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus M32CD4-K (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M32CD4-K
Memory	7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170106
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '19 at 16:00
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	47%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	67.7% Good	Memory 74.3 1-Core 103 2-Core 182 69% 120 Pts	4-Core 329 8-Core 581 55% 455 Pts	64-Core 563 35% 563 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Asus(1043 868A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	11.9% Very poor	Lighting 11.7 Reflection 90.8 Parallax 38.4 10% 47 fps	MRender 26.5 Gravity 17.5 Splatting 17.8 16% 20.6 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SB8U512G1002 512GB 2,367 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 257GB free (System drive) Firmware: X4131002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 270 268 248 268 270 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Read 411 Write 316 Mixed 221 SusWrite 270 68% 304 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 44 4K Mixed 28.4 90% 30.8 MB/s	DQ Read 362 DQ Write 251 DQ Mixed 194 175% 269 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 103%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 224GB free Firmware: MS2OA8K0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 117 110 102 101 101 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	61.3% Good	Read 103 Write 113 Mixed 23.3 SusWrite 111 63% 87.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB 24,860 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	65.4% Good	MC Read 27.4 MC Write 25.7 MC Mixed 21.7 71% 24.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 16.3 SC Mixed 11.9 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 91.9 44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M32CD4-K Builds (Compare 691 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Asus M32CD4-K

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	395x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	264x
Pentium G4560Intel $31Bench 57%, 70,054 samples	8x

GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	207x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	91x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	50x

SSD
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GBBench 63%, 4,377 samples	62x
SD8SBAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 58%, 3,654 samples	49x
SD8SB8U512G1002 512GBSandiskBench 81%, 2,367 samples	21x

RAM
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 21,551 samples	105x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 12GBHynixBench 51%, 2,347 samples	49x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $196

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16