Gigabyte B450M DS3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive220% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte B450M DS3H
MotherboardGigabyte B450M DS3H  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 22 '19 at 13:29
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 102
2-Core 195
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 377
50% 378 Pts
64-Core 380
24% 380 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Asus(1043 051D) ≥ 4GB; Rx 470 4GB mining bulk
CLim: 1256 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
48% Average
Lighting 59.5
Reflection 63.5
Parallax 81.7
48% 68.2 fps
MRender 64.8
Gravity 57.5
Splatting 52.6
47% 58.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asgard AN2 500NVMe-M.2/80 500GB
366GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0802C0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1381 1417 856 1365 894 366 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 1,691
Write 1,680
Mixed 1,179
SusWrite 1,047
314% 1,399 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 41.3
208% 80.5 MB/s
DQ Read 743
DQ Write 469
DQ Mixed 61.9
193% 425 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 220%
Great: 263%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
639GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 170 167 166 170 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 173
Mixed 109
SusWrite 169
116% 158 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$24
91GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 89 90 90 90 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 75.3
Write 74.8
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 90.1
54% 73.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 41.1
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 35.6
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 38.1
SC Mixed 26.7
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 105%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450M DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 16,646 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450M DS3H - $95

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $438
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback