Gigabyte GA-P17F

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P17F (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140903
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '19 at 05:55
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$50 15,557 User benchmarks, average bench 60% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	71% Very good	Memory 84.4 1-Core 98.6 2-Core 196 73% 126 Pts	4-Core 312 8-Core 521 51% 416 Pts	64-Core 517 32% 517 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 850M 13,931 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Clevo(1558 6501) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3086 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Lighting 21 Reflection 15.9 Parallax 18.7 17% 18.5 fps	MRender 13.8 Gravity 21 Splatting 15.4 14% 16.7 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSFJ256GCSU 256GB 3,843 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 172GB free (System drive) Firmware: JULA1102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 450 460 455 451 453 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 481 Write 432 Mixed 435 SusWrite 449 101% 449 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 79.1 4K Mixed 42.1 132% 48.5 MB/s	DQ Read 359 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 348 260% 344 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 100%
Samsung 860 EVO mSATA 250GB 1,851 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 175GB free Firmware: RVT41B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 466 413 295 293 293 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 452 Write 457 Mixed 407 SusWrite 367 95% 421 MB/s	4K Read 31.9 4K Write 99.1 4K Mixed 54.5 171% 61.8 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 359 271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 121%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB 50,772 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 687GB free Firmware: 2BC10008 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 92 92 92 92 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	55.3% Above average	Read 100 Write 63.2 Mixed 56.2 SusWrite 91.6 57% 77.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.8 194% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend TS1GSK64W6H 1315 CT102464BF160B.C16 16GB 70 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	56.5% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 20.8 MC Mixed 16.4 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 19.7 51% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 72.8 55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P17F Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P17F

CPU
Core i7-4710MQIntel $50Bench 60%, 15,557 samples	5x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	4x
GTX 850MNvidiaBench 14%, 13,931 samples	1x

SSD
IT LMT-128L9M 128GBLiteonBench 81%, 1,236 samples	1x
WDS100T2G0A-00JH30 1TBWDCBench 54%, 17,953 samples	1x
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	1x

RAM
TS1GSK64W6H 2x8GBTranscendBench 54%, 1,168 samples	2x
HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 19,744 samples	1x
CT102464BF160B.M16 Transcend TS1GSK64W6H 16GBUnknownBench 55%, 34 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $50

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16