Asus G750JS

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	24.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus G750JS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G750JS
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140717
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 21 '19 at 14:49
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4710HQ 69,536 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	Memory 80.9 1-Core 104 2-Core 201 73% 128 Pts	4-Core 387 8-Core 522 58% 455 Pts	64-Core 519 32% 519 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 870M 3,247 User benchmarks, average bench 22% Asus(1043 157D) 3GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	24.5% Poor	Lighting 30.1 Reflection 28 Parallax 34.9 24% 31 fps	MRender 31.7 Gravity 36.4 Splatting 23.8 24% 30.6 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 24%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 302GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 460 466 476 477 477 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	Read 497 Write 470 Mixed 371 SusWrite 470 102% 452 MB/s	4K Read 40.6 4K Write 86.9 4K Mixed 53.2 176% 60.2 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 346 DQ Mixed 361 271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 134%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 717GB free Firmware: JB0OA3J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 130 130 130 129 130 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Read 132 Write 119 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 130 74% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 75%
SanDisk Extreme Go USB 3.1 64GB-$23 2,139 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 58GB free, PID 558b Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 0.1 13 0.2 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Write 43.9 Mixed 48 SusWrite 8.3 54% 33.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0.9 70% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 0215 CMSX8GX3M1A1600C10 M471B5173QH0-YK0 16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	37.7% Below average	MC Read 13.2 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 11 35% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 13.4 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 79 51% 79 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G750JS Builds (Compare 326 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus G750JS

CPU
Core i7-4700HQIntel $370Bench 62%, 42,062 samples	210x
Core i7-4710HQIntelBench 58%, 69,536 samples	115x
Core i7-4712HQIntelBench 61%, 5,396 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	208x
GTX 870MNvidiaBench 22%, 3,247 samples	118x

SSD
mSATA SD5SE2256G1002E 256GBSanDiskBench 71%, 860 samples	26x
X110 256GBSanDisk $100Bench 79%, 4,989 samples	16x
RBU-SC100S37128GD 128GBKingstonBench 58%, 1,846 samples	9x

RAM
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 22,647 samples	79x
HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 51%, 18,309 samples	26x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $370

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16