Acer Predator PH517-61

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics73.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive301% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator PH517-61  (all builds)
MotherboardPRS Cayman_PRS
Memory45.5 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 21 '19 at 00:50
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 82.3
1-Core 129
2-Core 254
86% 155 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 971
86% 730 Pts
64-Core 1,266
78% 1,266 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Acer(1025 1246) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1301 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.12
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.4% Very good
Lighting 91.6
Reflection 70.3
Parallax 129
75% 96.9 fps
MRender 68.7
Gravity 89.1
Splatting 96.7
71% 84.8 fps
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 75%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$87
898GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0118C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1156 1152 1157 1157 1109 1163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
301% Outstanding
Read 2,587
Write 2,035
Mixed 1493
SusWrite 1,149
405% 1,816 MB/s
4K Read 61.4
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 82.3
272% 94.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,049
DQ Write 890
DQ Mixed 503
504% 814 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 301%
Great: 372%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH Kingston KHX2666C15S4/16G Kingston KHX2666C15S4/16G HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 48GB
2400, 2667, 2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
88.2% Excellent
MC Read 33
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 29.1
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 27.6
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH517-61 Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer

System: Acer Predator PH517-61

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $585
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback