MSI A88X-G45 GAMING (MS-7900)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics54.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7900
MotherboardMSI A88X-G45 GAMING (MS-7900)  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '19 at 18:39
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
40.1% Average
Memory 60.1
1-Core 47.4
2-Core 96.6
42% 68 Pts
4-Core 117
8-Core 123
16% 120 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Lighting 65.8
Reflection 66.6
Parallax 64.7
54% 65.7 fps
MRender 71
Gravity 65.5
Splatting 66
55% 67.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vector 180 240GB-$160
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 403 387 438 404 437 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 391
Write 411
Mixed 312
SusWrite 395
85% 377 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 69.2
4K Mixed 28.7
104% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 232
182% 252 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
433GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 181 181 179 181 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 169
Mixed 55
SusWrite 180
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 101%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
20.2% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 5.7
20% 6.87 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 5.5
14% 4.9 GB/s
Latency 127
31% 127 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88X-G45 GAMING (MS-7900) Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A88X-G45 GAMING (MS-7900) - $119

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $254
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback