Dell Precision 7720

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemDell Precision 7720  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0WDWGH
Memory57.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170614
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 20 '19 at 17:04
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7920HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 86.8
1-Core 120
2-Core 233
82% 147 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 584
64% 508 Pts
64-Core 600
37% 600 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 83%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000
Dell(1028 17B1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1252 MHz, MLim: 1501 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 397.93
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.2% Above average
Lighting 64
Reflection 59.2
Parallax 48.8
52% 57.3 fps
MRender 68.8
Gravity 65.5
Splatting 68
55% 67.5 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 57%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron 1100 SATA 1024GB
339GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0DL003
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 372
Write 304
Mixed 238
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 50
4K Mixed 21.5
79% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 253
194% 262 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
79.3% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 25.9
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 24.2
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision 7720 Builds (Compare 1,422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision 7720

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $33
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback