Asrock Z77 Performance

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Performance  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '19 at 00:07
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 96.3
1-Core 123
2-Core 242
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 608
66% 523 Pts
64-Core 607
38% 607 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,446
Write 6,300
Mixed 6,323
1,421% 6,356 MB/s
4K Read 383
4K Write 250
4K Mixed 299
1,095% 311 MB/s
DQ Read 1,019
DQ Write 718
DQ Mixed 821
626% 853 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
105GB free
Firmware: DXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 127 127 128 128 127 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 468
Write 128
Mixed 127
SusWrite 127
46% 212 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 61.6
4K Mixed 18.9
94% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 47.8
82% 167 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 73%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$99
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 60 58 59 58 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
69% Good
Read 182
Write 180
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 58.3
80% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69%
Great: 108%
Asrock 3TB+ Unlocker 802GB
724GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 60 58 59 58 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 124
Write 136
Mixed 15.3
SusWrite 58.2
60% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 25
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.9
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 24
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 52.8
76% 52.8 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Performance Builds (Compare 168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Performance

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback