TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-X99-Designare EX-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics66.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-Designare EX-CF  (all builds)
Memory60.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 19 '19 at 17:45
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 96.5
2-Core 187
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 466
50% 397 Pts
64-Core 569
35% 569 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑
This bench: 74.9%
 Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Gigabyte(1458 367C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
66.6% Good
Lighting 85.4
Reflection 85
Parallax 74.9
70% 81.8 fps
MRender 82
Gravity 75.2
Splatting 67.8
61% 75 fps
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 66.6%
 Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPE2MW800G4 800GB
637GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8EV10171
SusWrite @10s intervals: 788 782 789 791 782 797 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 776
Write 807
Mixed 575
SusWrite 788
166% 736 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 46.8
183% 73.7 MB/s
DQ Read 700
DQ Write 574
DQ Mixed 638
477% 637 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑
This bench: 163%
 Great: 217%
Intel SSDPE2MW800G4 800GB
688GB free
Firmware: 8EV10135
SusWrite @10s intervals: 845 833 853 846 845 843 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 632
Write 816
Mixed 487
SusWrite 844
157% 695 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 43.9
200% 81.7 MB/s
DQ Read 731
DQ Write 651
DQ Mixed 698
521% 693 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑
This bench: 167%
 Great: 217%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 2400 C14 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
75.2% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 28.4
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 16.1
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 67% ↑
This bench: 75.2%
 Great: 132%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-X99-Designare EX-CF Builds (Compare 180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-Designare EX-CF

CPU
Core i7-6950XIntel  $449Bench 87%, 6,135 samples56x
Core i7-6850KIntel  $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples52x
Core i7-6800KIntel  $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples24x
GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples43x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples27x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia  $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples10x
SSD
SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung  $69Bench 205%, 12,601 samples15x
Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)WD  $75Bench 244%, 109,999 samples15x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung  $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples9x
RAM
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 122%, 173 samples17x
Ripjaws 4 DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 95%, 1,053 samples14x
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 92%, 6,789 samples9x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $713
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback