HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory13.7 GB free of 16.002 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 19 '19 at 09:39
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5667
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 83.7
2-Core 157
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 384
42% 330 Pts
64-Core 404
25% 404 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5000
HP(103C 0965) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Lighting 26.3
Reflection 24.6
Parallax 32.7
22% 27.9 fps
MRender 36.3
Gravity 30.6
Splatting 22.6
24% 29.8 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 240 240GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 90 100 105 60 54 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.8% Very poor
Read 114
Write 39.7
Mixed 70
SusWrite 86
17% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 12.1
4K Mixed 8.4
27% 9.03 MB/s
DQ Read 33
DQ Write 35.6
DQ Mixed 30.1
24% 32.9 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 104%
Hitachi HDS72101 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: A41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 118 116 119 118 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 125
Write 121
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 118
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M391B5273BH1-CF8 ID:80 CE M391B5273BH1-CF8 ID:80 CE M391B5273BH1-CF8 ID:80 CE M391B5273BH1-CF8 50GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.3% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 11
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 11.6
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,952 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback