Asrock CPS-N68

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock CPS-N68 (all builds)
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1360 x 765 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170627
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 17 '19 at 21:00
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$90 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	61% Good	Memory 87.1 1-Core 59 2-Core 108 55% 84.8 Pts	4-Core 191 8-Core 277 29% 234 Pts	64-Core 265 16% 265 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	30.8% Below average	Lighting 38.2 Reflection 29.9 Parallax 40.5 31% 36.2 fps	MRender 38.3 Gravity 37.9 Splatting 35.5 30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Reeinno FR128GB S4S3 128GB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q110 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 53 58 59 42 33 MB/s Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.3% Average	Read 244 Write 207 Mixed 146 SusWrite 57.1 36% 163 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 53.1 4K Mixed 14.2 88% 31.6 MB/s	DQ Read 36.5 DQ Write 78.3 DQ Mixed 17.7 25% 44.2 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 100%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 297GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 103 105 105 105 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	Read 100 Write 97.2 Mixed 63 SusWrite 104 67% 91.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905471-006.A00LF BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.1% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 15.4 43% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 12.1 28% 9.73 GB/s	Latency 70.4 57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CPS-N68 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

Motherboard: Asrock CPS-N68

CPU
Athlon II X2 4400eAMDBench 43%, 375 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1x

RAM
JM1333KLU-2G L18 08/11 MEMORYON 4GBUnknownBench 34%, 2 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $59

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock CPS-N68

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock CPS-N68

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)