Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	8.41% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Red RHEV Hypervisor (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	4 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	3.5 Days
Run Date	Jun 17 '19 at 20:01
Run Duration	348 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	58%

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E312xx (Sandy Bridge) 54 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU 0, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	33.8% Below average	Memory 42.7 1-Core 65.2 2-Core 122 43% 76.7 Pts	4-Core 152 8-Core 110 18% 131 Pts	64-Core 140 9% 140 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 72%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 161GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 13 12 32 38 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	8.41% Terrible	Read 53.8 Write 19 Mixed 52.6 SusWrite 19.8 8% 36.3 MB/s	4K Read 6.2 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 4.2 17% 4.6 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 8.41% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Red Hat 1x12GB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 1 of 1 slots used 12GB DIMM RAM Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	34% Below average	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 8.7 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 5.1 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 7 17% 5.87 GB/s	Latency 190 21% 190 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 163%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16