Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	83% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181207
Uptime	4 Days
Run Date	Jun 17 '19 at 16:53
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	78.6% Very good	Memory 71 1-Core 120 2-Core 240 78% 144 Pts	4-Core 462 8-Core 741 74% 602 Pts	64-Core 941 58% 941 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3301) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	83% Excellent	Lighting 105 Reflection 109 Parallax 91 86% 102 fps	MRender 93.7 Gravity 92.6 Splatting 96.1 77% 94.1 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,675 Write 1,324 Mixed 555 261% 1,185 MB/s	4K Read 31.9 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 37.1 157% 61.4 MB/s	DQ Read 923 DQ Write 794 DQ Mixed 597 519% 771 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Tcsunbow X3 240GB 3,491 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 37GB free Firmware: R1001A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 23 21 23 21 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	40.7% Average	Read 484 Write 42.7 Mixed 53.2 SusWrite 22.5 32% 151 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 14.9 4K Mixed 5 56% 15.7 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 34.1 DQ Mixed 12.7 32% 72.8 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 116%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2133 4x4GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.1% Very good	MC Read 28.4 MC Write 25.9 MC Mixed 23.5 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 19.2 SC Write 29.2 SC Mixed 24.7 70% 24.4 GB/s	Latency 99 40% 99 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,037 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	841x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	628x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	291x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $296Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	298x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	237x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	227x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	102x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	91x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	74x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	181x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	134x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	128x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $452

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16